VIDEO:
GOOGLE I/O 2011
I really loved this video and I want to thank the
opportunity to learn from ideas like the ones expressed in the speech by Annalee Newitz.
Technology is portrayed
as an independent individual with will.
Society is controlled by machines or technological devices and people are
conducted to behave in a certain way. And what´s more, technology dictates how
people must think creating a global thought, a common mind and a unique way of
thinking. Technology in these works is
not depicted as a tool for the use of people but as an engine which thinks for
you and set the rules of our way of life. And moreover, people is not aware of
this fact, so society is depicted as a global being, completely alienated and
without control of their own lives.
In Matrix, some characters are aware of this
situation but they have to fight “the machine” and they live unhappily as they
know the truth, they know that people is being used and controlled, that
technology is not a tool anymore and that people are the sustenance of
technology instead, they have seen the “backstage” of the virtual world
presented to be believed as the real one. The others, on the contrary, live
alienated and unconscious, they “sleep” and let technology rule their lives as
you can live happily and without preoccupations. This is the way I see society,
there are a lot of people who are ignorant, but not in a disrespectful way, but
in the sense some do not know, they ignore how the system works and what we
mean for the system. I think The Matrix portrays the System, a global machine
which controls society as a whole, not as a individuals with needs, a massive
economic system, a fixed world political system and how humans are seen by it.
Whenever I use
facebook, I realize how quick a piece of information is spread. People do not
want to be left behind and most of them share and share the same picture, piece
of information or video to feel they form part of a whole. The hive mind is on
its way, and even if we are aware of that, we keep on doing it, and we decide
that that is the way we live our virtual life, the way we communicate, we learn
and we know about reality which, in my opinion, is not responsible. Actions
like these foment the collective thought .I think we are part of a massive
global mind so these fictional discourses, in their basis, should not be considered fictional but a
portray of society nowadays too.
She also talks about
privacy on the internet and she states that we do not have any privacy but we
can hide the information about ourselves expressed on the internet to those
ones we choose. But the core idea is that we do not own any privacy at all. And
I think this is quite accurate. We publish details of our lives on the internet
every day. Anyone has access to that information, even if we do not know them
at all. We are completely exposed to the mercy of control and surveillance.
I would consider these
words as dystopian in the sense that what technology offers in these situations
is not positive but negative for society and for individuality. I have always
thought too that we consider as a real portrayal of the future what some
fictional discourses describe. I mean, when we think about the future, as we
cannot have an accurate vision of it (it is impossible as it has not happened
yet) we take fictional discourses as a reference. So, in a way, we think that
is the way our future will be. Let´s take 1984 as a reference. We do have
surveillance, control over society is so established that we do not even wonder
why, we can see our rulers on the screens and we listen to their speeches on
television or pc screens, and many governments are nowadays as totalitarian and
repressive as in the novel. So, is it a coincidence? Were these authors such
visionaries? I do not think so. Therefore, it is logical to think that we
accept technological progress as “natural” and a part of our destiny.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario